I have been busy converting the RiverSoftAVG code to support Delphi XE4. I promise to discuss this process in more detail later, but right now, I have to talk about a pet peeve of mine. I guarantee my recommendation is controversial with some people, and perhaps, I should avoid it for my very first real blog post, but I just have to go with it…
Descend your objects from TPersistent, not TObject
It is amazing how useful the TPersistent class is, and how little it is actually used. Embarcadero is especially guilty of this. The TPersistent class is not just about persisting a class, it is arguably more useful to use the class to copy from one class to another. Unfortunately, Embarcadero leaves large swaths of the Vcl/FMX library descending from TObject instead of TPersistent.
One of my favorite tricks when developing a class is to use the AssignTo protected method as a method to assign my class to a TStrings object. I override the AssignTo method, detect if the destination object is TStrings and then fill the TStrings with appropriate text.
For example, my handy-dandy string some type of list/collection class could have:
procedure TMyStringCollection.AssignTo(Dest: TPersistent); begin if Dest is TStrings then begin TStrings(Dest).BeginUpdate; try TStrings(Dest).Clear; for i := 0 to Count - 1 do TStrings(Dest).AddObject(MyString[i], MyItem[i]); finally TStrings(Dest).EndUpdate; end; end else begin inherited AssignTo(Dest); end; end;
This little trick makes it easy to quickly see the contents of my list in a TListBox, TMemo,… you name it. You just do code like:
ListBox1.Items := MyStringCollection1;
If Embarcadero had made TObjectList descend from a persistent TList, that AssignTo could easily have been:
procedure TObjectList.AssignTo(Dest: TPersistent); begin if Dest is TStrings then begin TStrings(Dest).BeginUpdate; try TStrings(Dest).Clear; for i := 0 to Count - 1 do TStrings(Dest).AddObject(Items[i].ToString, Items[i]); finally TStrings(Dest).EndUpdate; end; end else begin inherited AssignTo(Dest); end; end;
Wouldn’t that be incredibly useful for quickly dumping a TObjectList? Unfortunately, they didn’t. TList doesn’t descend from TPersistent; it descends from TObject. Even worse, TList<T> (the generics version of TList) and TObjectList<T> don’t descend from TPersistent (and this is where my latest aggravation comes from). With generics lists, Embarcadero has no idea what I will put in the generic. If they had descended from TPersistent, I could have overridden AssignTo and done whatever I want. Not just assign to TStrings, but any other class.
In order to support mobile, I need to get away from using TLists and casting Pointers around. Embarcadero recommends replacing TLists with generics. Now I have a hard choice of using their generic classes and losing TStrings compatibility or making my own and losing compatibility with their generics.
Most likely, I will descend from their generics classes and graft on an Assign and AssignTo method, but it is far from ideal.Because I also need my lists/tables to persist (the IECS overrides the hash table/dictionary so that they can be read and write properties), I will have to make my own basic generics classes.
Granted, there is the argument to be made that Embarcadero should have put the Assign/AssignTo code at the TObject level and left TPersistent for classes that truly persist themselves. And I can completely agree with that, unfortunately they didn’t. Perhaps in the future they will do so, it is not the first time that they added important new methods to TObject after many years of leaving them out. I had Equals and ToString in all my objects almost a decade before they got around to adding it. If they add them, I will rejoice (and for goodness sake, add in Clone as well). (At the same time, I must admit I will be cursing them because now I have to handle 2 inheritance hierarchies in supporting legacy code 🙂 ).
There is also an argument that object purists will make that classes should not know about other classes. And this one, I totally understand and I must admit it does make me a little uncomfortable. However, I consider TStrings a basic class, only one level below TObject and TPersistent (actually, anything in Classes.pas is basic (such as TCollection) to my mind and can be supported). And the Assign/AssignTo paradigm was expressly designed to avoid this. TStrings does not need to know about my class to be assigned back and forth to it. My class just needs to know about TStrings.
So the next time you are tempted to descend your incredibly useful class from TObject instead of from TPersistent, just don’t.
That’s all for now from the Delphi CodeSmith.